Right Punditry

"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 10:2

Liberals Continue To Prove They’re “Untethered” From Moral And Ethical Standards

Hoover CINOSocially liberal Republican consultant Margaret Hoover went on a tear against Dr. Ben Carson on Wednesday’s New Day on CNN

Margaret Hoover, Republican consultant: …[I]t’s hard to give a serious analysis of this. But the truth is, we know Ben Carson is sort of untethered to reality anyway. No person – citizen has run for the U.S. presidency, not having served any other elected office ….. So, there’s no way he was going to be elected to the presidency anyway. But this!…But – but this just demonstrates (Carson’s anti-same-sex “marriage” belief)– I mean, first of all, there’s no data on this. Secondly, this sinks any nomination. If he has looked at any of the polling about where American attitudes are about homosexuality” . . .

HOOVER: His party, by the way, is my party. I am intimately familiar with the Republican base. Fifty percent of Republicans under the age of 50 are in favor of freedom to marry”

AVLON: Wahoo! Fired up there, babe! . . . .

HOOVER: And another – another 300 incredibly prominent Republicans are about to sign onto a brief for the Supreme Court saying – or making a conservative case for the freedom to marry. There is more and more support for the freedom to marry. Every primary state is going to have marriage by the time we have marriage”  here

Liberals are “untethered” from morality and ethics . . .  provable by who they support, nominate and elect to office.  This can and does include those Liberal Republicans who turn their snotty noses against morality to pursue a Liberal nominees. And please note, that the ‘politically correct’ John Avlon, editor-in-chief of the Daily Beast, refers to this woman as “babe”.  An immediate death sentence, were in invoked by any Republican. No doubt this fall from politically correct graces, will be overlooked by the hypocritical Liberals.

Dr. Ben Carson, who is a self-proclaimed Christian and who converted to Conservative principles some years ago, had the audacity to speak the truth and will receive condemnation for it. As would be expected, since Liberals detest hearing moral standards enunciated.

Without delving into the how’s and what nots’ of homosexual activity, it will suffice to say, it is sin and a learned behavior.  Hoover and the rest can mock, laugh and bemoan all such statements, since this is expected response from the willfully uninformed. She can however,  rightly tout his probable inability to be elected, since there’s little doubt that America has become a morally corrupt nation. But what she shouldn’t do is behave like the town crier for Republicans values . . . . or Biblical ones.

The base of the Republican Party is still Conservatives. They have no where else to go, at present, since there are none welcomed in the Democrat Party.  If the “majority” of youth calling themselves Conservative have no problem with homosexuals marrying, that is further evidence of the decline of America. Years of propaganda and rejection of principles values, will do that to any nation.

Homosexuals can get married by anyone performing a ceremony — but what they really want is  to force government and all other people, to accept and respect their perversion. That can’t be done. Not in a free society. We all have a “right” to our views, but not the “facts”. And the fact is still that marriage is an institution, created by God for one man and one woman. Period.

Genesis 2:22-24  Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. 23 The man said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman, ‘ for she was taken out of man.” 24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.

Therefore, Dr. Carson isn’t wrong. He’s certainly isn’t “untethered from reality” nor a Conservative “bigot” who should be flogged by the simple-minded, truth-rejecting Liberal ‘news readers’.  But he will be because he stands on principle. Something rarely if ever found in the devoted Liberal or Democrat.

Immorality and unethical behavior, as well as lawlessness and criminality activity, is not just accepted by Democrats, supporters and voters, it is honored and revered. Otherwise, both of the Clinton’s would have been imprisoned decades ago, instead of becoming Democrat ‘icons’. Sen. Ted Kennedy, too, would have spent many years in prison for leaving the scene of a crime and allowing a woman to drown. And Barack Hussein Obama would have been thrown out of office years ago, by self-respecting Democrats and Republicans for his unlawful, illegal and unconstitutional acts.

Margaret Hoover, as well as the rest of the proud, ignorant Liberals, who diss morals and ethical standards, would serve themselves better if they placed those two elements a little higher on their totem poles.  Referring to this as “freedom to marry” is simply another straw-man argument for the easily distracted and ignorantly uninformed. The morally bankrupt will embrace it because it’s easy and takes no thought . . . nor morals.

 

 UPDATE: The biased “news readers” IGNORED Barack Hussein’s statement that homosexuality is a “lifestyle choice” here

Advertisements

10 comments on “Liberals Continue To Prove They’re “Untethered” From Moral And Ethical Standards

  1. Crash MacDuff
    March 5, 2015

    Reblogged this on Crash Course.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Father Paul Lemmen
    March 5, 2015

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.

    Like

  3. BJ
    March 5, 2015

    Make a distinction between marriage and civil unions. Anyone who wants to should have the freedom and right to do so gay or straight. Marriage is a religious institution and the state has no business regulating it for or against. The decision whether or not to marry a couple should reside exclusively with the pastor or church governing body. That marriage should contain no legalities, tax breaks etc. It is a covenant before God and should not, cannot be demeaned by something as petty as legal status. Save that for civil unions… which should be open and accessable to all.

    Like

    • RightyPunditry
      March 5, 2015

      No, I won’t do that…. civil union is the same abomination as ‘marriage’, with a different title. Going down that road is equally as bad and with the same results.

      Like

      • BJ
        March 6, 2015

        Marriage is not a legal institution. It is a holy one. Whether or not you open access for all, separating the legal aspect of civil unions from the holy aspect if marriage is demanded if we truly want to keep separation of church and state. It will also protect churches from the day when states begin granting “equal marriages” to those the church would rightly refuse to marry.

        Like

      • RightyPunditry
        March 6, 2015

        In American, it is both a “religious” and legal one, whether we like it or not. “Separation of church and state” has been maligned to mean something it does not…. that the State must stay out of the churches business – not that “the church” isn’t allowed within government. The ‘state’ should never be able to tell church what to do, but as we clearly see, Liberalism has destroyed that with our current fascist federal government.
        As I said, homosexuals can marry — but it should not be endorse by the government, church, or the nation’s people. That is also being destroyed by Liberalism. It is better to disprove, reject the activity, pray and give them the Word, than to go along with their agenda. Sodom and Gomorrah were actually places.

        Like

      • BJ
        March 6, 2015

        Yes Sodom and Gomorrah were places. Places that were destroyed because of pride, gluttony, laziness, and not caring for the poor and needy.

        Like

      • RightyPunditry
        March 9, 2015

        You misread — they were destroyed due to the sin of out of control homosexual activities and acceptance by the people.

        Like

      • BJ
        March 9, 2015

        Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. 50 They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.
        Ezekiel 16:49-50

        Like

  4. RightyPunditry
    March 9, 2015

    I dare say, not a city since creation hasn’t committed that sin of ignoring some of the “poor and needy”. Jude 7 declares, “…Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion.” but, while homosexuality was not the only sin in which the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah indulged, it does appear to be the primary reason for the destruction of the cities. Therefore, one can’t attempt to explain away the biblical condemnations of homosexuality by claiming that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was inhospitality or not caring for the poor. There is probably nothing more inhospitable than homosexual gang rape. But to say God completely destroyed two cities and all their inhabitants for being inhospitable clearly misses the point. While Sodom and Gomorrah were guilty of many other horrendous sins, homosexuality was the reason God poured fiery sulfur on the cities, completely destroying them and all of their inhabitants. To this day, the area where Sodom and Gomorrah were located remains a desolate wasteland. Sodom and Gomorrah serve as a powerful example of how God feels about sin in general, and homosexuality specifically.” more – http://www.gotquestions.org/Sodom-and-Gomorrah.html#ixzz3TveW0YoX

    Like

Comments are closed.

Ronald Reagan

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." Ronald Reagan
%d bloggers like this: